Featured Post

3 Cost Effective Ways to Solve Metro Manila's Traffic Problem

Image
The Facebook page of ANC 24/7 is asking for its reader's suggestion on how to solve Metro Manila's traffic problem. This got me thinking, "what is the best way to solve Metro Manila's traffic problem?" It's easy to make suggestions, what's hard is the implementation and the cost of implementation. So what is the the best way to solve Metro Manila's traffic problem and the most cost effective solution? Punitive Fines Add caption First of all, any implementation will definitely cost money, a lot of money. The cause of the traffic mess is the people themselves so it's only right that those causing the traffic problem should be fined and the fine should hurt. That way, the fines will pay for the cost of enforcing the law. The fines should start at P500 and goes up every week if you don't pay it within 15 days. To enforce this and prevent people from ignoring the fine. It will be tied to their driver's license or car registr

PPI collapse dashes dreams of 245,000 policyholders

(First of three parts)

“It was just too much to bear,” said Edna Roxas, a 45-year-old mother of two, upon hearing the bad news that Prudentialife Plans Inc. (PPI) had collapsed.

Roxas, who worked as a midwife in Libya from 1991 to 2001 so she could send her daughter and son to college, said she had spent nearly P400,000 over a five-year period during her overseas employment to pay premiums for two educational plans she had bought for them.
“I did not mind going to the Middle East and working in long-hour shifts because I wanted to support my children and make sure they go to college,” Roxas told the Inquirer. Her job, she recalled, would often require her to work 24 hours.

What she thought was a valuable investment proved to be good in helping pay the tuition of her daughter only for the first year in college. Her son, who would be in college next year, will never benefit from the educational plan.

Minerva Lubong, 61, who owns an eatery in Nueva Vizcaya province, expressed shock upon learning that PPI was in liquidation. She helped her husband, Abraham, who works as a farmer, pay for a pension plan bought from the preneed firm.

The couple had banked on the preneed policy to help support them in old age.

“We were told that buying a pension plan was a good investment. It turned out we lost money because of what happened to PPI. It is difficult to accept that we just lost our money that way,” Minerva said in Filipino.

The Lubongs paid a total of P84,900 from 2002 to 2006 as premiums for the pension plan, which was supposed to have matured last year. Under the preneed policy, which was in her husband’s name, they were supposed to get P100,000 in benefits last year and P100,000 in 2017.

245,000 plan holders

Roxas and Lubong were just two of some 245,000 plan holders who suffered losses from the collapse of PPI.

Under the terms of liquidation of the company, policyholders will be reimbursed the amount they spent for premiums but with huge cuts.

According to the Insurance Commission (IC), payments shall be done in two installments. The first covers the recovery of PPI’s liquid assets (cash), while the second covers nonliquid assets, mainly investments in securities.

Under the first installment, holders of PPI education plans shall get back only 19 percent of their total contributions; holders of pension plans, 40 percent; and those of memorial plans, 80 percent.

This means that an educational plan holder who paid P100,000 in premiums but did not receive benefits before PPI’s collapse will recover only P19,000.

A pension plan holder, who paid the same amount and did not receive benefits, ought to get P40,000, and a memorial plan holder, P80,000.


Read more: http://newsinfo.inquirer.net/488207/ppi-collapse-dashes-dreams-of-245000-policyholders#ixzz2f2TSfCsK

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Family Planning TVC 2014

Is Piolo Pascual Gay?

Philippine Business Monopolies